Link of interest

“A Short History of the RPN”: A radio podcast interview of Sebastian Ronin. – July 27, 2014

Advertisements
Published in: on July 27, 2014 at 8:00 pm  Comments (7)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://caesartort.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/link-of-interest/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

7 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. I agree and disagree with Sebastian on quite a few points.

    I agree with most of Sebas’ criticism of American-style white nationalism and that Covington is mainly a writer, not an actual politician. But…

    Somewhere during the interview, did Sebas imply that 9/11 was an inside job? Readers of WDH know that conspiracy theories are utter BS for me. He also said that the holocaust was a lie. Well, I still have to read our best historian on the Third Reich, David Irving; especially his book on Himmler. (I only believe that the 6 million figure is a lie; but 2 million of kikes or more might have died during that war.)

    After listening the interview I wonder if Sebas is promoting women in the inner party? I ask this because I am a real traditionalist: no women were politically empowered in the most virile, martial societies that we must admire in our history. Feminist quotas are to be avoided at all costs, especially in the coming holy wars which will be the nastiest of all history due to the WMD. Compassionate women would only impede final solutions to our many problems.

    More important is that both Sebas and his interviewer reject genocide on non-whites in the coming struggle for secession. I believe they are contradicting themselves on this point.

    If energy devolution is pivotal in their worldview, there’s no chance that a white ethnostate will survive with a gluttonous new kid on the bloc like China unless it hostilely takes over the oil fields of non-white countries later in the century (which would condemn them to die like flies). Since Mother Nature will kill at least 5 billion of humans, there’s no chance that the ethno-nationalists in charge of a newly-formed State won’t ferociously fight for the ever scarcer fields after Nature hits the fan.

    In other words, Sebas et al cannot have it both ways—peak oil and behave like Christian axiologists with the sand-niggers. On this point they’re on the same page of a recent article by Greg Johnson, the wishful belief that the ethnostate will be achieved without true “Rivers of Blood”.

  2. 1. 9/11 was an inside job, quarterbacked by the Amerikan Military and abetted by Mossad; you are welcome to think what you want
    2. I lean to the Red Cross number of roughly 750K Jewish deaths, mostly, but not all, from disease; the actual number is arbitrary, it does not translate into the engineered “Hollow Cause”, engineered by the British Secret Service and the CIA
    3. support from women does not necessarily and directly translate into political decision-making; we go the electoral route, not the route of soggy, basement wet dreams
    4. collapse offers opportunity and somewhat of a level playing field, no more and no less; right now we do not even have that
    5. it was clearly stated in the interview that “negotiating” the carving up of the carcass could go either way, either post-violence (via the Globalist asset called RaHoWa) or SOMEWHAT of a softer landing
    6. White Ethno State is not limited to one only; to keep on repeating in the singular is a mistake; re the deeper the “Rivers of Blood” the less likely our chances of survival, or at the very least, meaningful survival (please do not mention my name in the same breath as Dr. Greggie)
    7. read the book

    • …please do not mention my name in the same breath as Dr. Greggie

      At least Greggie doesn’t believe in conspiratorial nonsense. Conspiracy theories are Murkan phenomena: JFK was killed by everyone except Oswald; the Moon landing “hoax”; the 1947 Rockwell UFO incident, and more. To boot, Murkan white nationalists are especially fond of 9/11 theories and urban myths.

      No really intelligent person believes that Mossad, the “omnipotent Jews” (this is WN paranoia), did it. For every engineer that claims controlled demolition there’s a saner engineer debunking the claim. As I put it elsewhere, Murkan conspiracy theories just are prolefeed for the proles.

      If the RPN is born promoting such prolefeed it won’t be taken seriously by the smarter guys.

      As to the so-called holocaust I believe that one must read Irving (I haven’t) because he has changed his mind more than once on this subject. It is not rational to pass judgment on a complicated subject if a real expert like Irving is not heard in the “courtroom”.

      I’ll read your book as soon as I can afford purchasing the Second Edition, which unlike the first one will mention “white suicide” according to one of your YouTube videos: a subject I am most interested in.

      By the way, I don’t propose alienating women in the electoral process while Murka still exists. My point is that they must never wield any power in the inner party. Most of them infantilize everything and some even become traitors (look to what happened to poor Covington). An NS-like movement is a Boys Only Club.

      • If you think that a gaggle of cave-dwellers with box cutters pulled off such a synchronized hit, be my guest. Read Ruppert’s “Crossing The Rubicon.” Yes, there is “conspiratorial nonsense.” Then there is The Empire up against the wall. The Globalists ripped off their masks for all to see; the launch of a century of warfare was signalled.

        Re “My point is that they must never wield any power in the inner party.” And they don’t. You made an assumption with your very first comment. I merely corrected it.

      • I didn’t say that women were already in the RPN inner party; only expressed my concern of that possibility.

  3. Have you noted the debris field of MH17? THAT is a debris field, not a hole in the ground that I could have dug with a back hoe.

    • On the West’s Darkest Hour (several articles: here) I mention a book that I read on such claims. As I said, for any engineer that sees conspiratorial evidence on something there’s another who debunks the claim.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: