The media & Clinton’s disease

poor-hillary

Editor’s note: Huffington Post took down Bill Robinson’s “Hillary Clinton Has Parkinson’s” article after her collapse at Ground Zero. Robinson’s removed article is reproduced below, including the author’s update:

 

Obviously, you cannot believe everything you read on the Internet.

Of course, those words were also uttered over the years about newspapers, then radio and then TV.

Just as obviously, you cannot simply dismiss all things read on the Internet either. For example, The Huffington Post is an Internet-only publication and publishes news that can be trusted.

So when Internet sources, however sketchy, start chiming in with evidence they say indicates that Hillary Clinton is not well, they should not be immediately discounted as the Leftist media is doing right now.

For the majority of readers here who don’t know, the last several weeks and months have brought increasing alarm from the ‘Alternative Media’ otherwise known as Conservatives that Hillary Clinton is sick.

Many sources and pundits have alleged Clinton has Parkinson’s Disease. While unconfirmed, the mainstream media is behaving like it is true and covering it up frantically.

Look, I’m sorry if Secretary Clinton is sick and I’m very sorry if she has Parkinson’s Disease.

But the American people simply cannot tolerate any lying, misinformation or wordplay if she is, in fact, ill. We need to know it and we need to know it well ahead of Election Day on November 8th.

If she doesn’t have a life-threatening ailment, then she should immediately submit to a thorough physical examination by an independent, non-governmental physician of great authority.

America cannot afford to end up with another un-elected President, Tim Kaine, of all people, to follow in the line of Tyler, Fillmore, Johnson, Arthur, (Teddy) Roosevelt, Coolidge, Truman, LBJ and Ford. With the definite exception of Roosevelt and possible exception of Truman, there was not an above-mediocre or barely competent President amongst them.

Right now, it looks as if the complicit media is helping hide her sickness. And to discover that she was lying about her health, submitting all kinds of ‘doctor’s notes’ as flimsy proof she’s up to the Olympian task of being the American President, would surprise nobody at this point.

For example, if you do a search on this publication for the terms “Hillary” and “Parkinson’s” together, you get zero, zilch, bupkis. A Google search on the exact same terms produces 577,000 hits in .32 seconds.

What you do get searching here interestingly, is a Number One search result of “I’m A Doctor. Here’s What I Find Most Concerning About Trump’s Medical Note.” Now why in the world would that result come up when searching “Hillary?”

There is—ironically—an ‘art-imitating-life’ example for this kind of deception of the American people: TV’s “West Wing” series. In the acclaimed Liberal drama, insufferable, Lefty creator Aaron Sorkin and company wrote a story line into the later seasons wherein President Bartlet (played by another Lefty Martin Sheen) intentionally fails to inform the American people that he has MS prior, leading up to and during an election.

Way too close for comfort is the way the Liberal media is completely uninterested in Hillary’s health, while the Conservative media is howling. What’s more, simply suggesting we get more information on the Dem nominee’s physical situation, has the media and ‘Clintonista’ surrogates start threatening and name-calling. What do they have to hide? Plenty apparently.

Yet another absurd media cover-up occurred on or about January 17th, 1998 when the Drudge Report, was a fledgling news source then regularly besmirched and disrespected by the New York Times, MSNBC and Newsweek. It was particularly notable that Newsweek would be so snooty about Drudge, as on this day Drudge reported that Newsweek was intentionally withholding a story about then President Clinton having a regular sexual liaison with a White House intern. This would be the beginning of the Monica Lewinsky/Impeachment fiasco for Hillary and her husband.

If the Clinton duo can give us, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman,” with finger wagging arrogantly, then why not a diminutive deception like “I’m in perfect health?”

For those who might’ve forgotten or new Millennial voters not alive or cognizant, here’s what the rest of us were treated to as the biggest Presidential lie of all time.

The ‘New Media’ is seemingly more and more the “Alternative Media” of Conservatives scrutinizing Liberal politicians and regularly coming up with the goods on them. Hillary’s health is the new, central Clinton drama unfolding before us. It’s clear to me that there’s something wrong with this woman.

Fast forward to the last few weeks and we have not only Conservative news sources hot on the trail of this Parkinson’s story but also Julian Assange and Wikileaks recently releasing very relevant emails regarding Hillary’s Parkinson’s symptoms and medicines. Could Wikileaks be the new Drudge to an even bigger Clinton lie?

Currently, we have a number of very red flags about Hillary’s health:

• Constant, unstoppable, coughing fits explained away by Hillary as “allergies.” Hmmm. These coughing jags are not allergies. While the news media takes an “it’s alright to cough” approach to Hillary’s obvious chronic illness, smart, aware people see this as simply another opportunity for a Clinton lie.

The American Mirror this week published a horrifying timeline of Hillary’s supposed “allergies.” It details with great specificity the regular and uncontrollable coughing seizures that Clinton has and includes videos of every one. Beginning on January 25th, 2016—hardly allergy season—Clinton began her stunning run of sickness. More episodes followed on February 16th, April 4th, May 5th, June 4th, August 31st and on September 5th, Hillary had not just one but two extreme coughing sessions. All supported with videos. Coughing jags such as these are typically associated with Parkinson’s Disease.

• The “brain freezes” that Hillary has had publicly several times. She seems to need to be prodded and reassured out of these by a mysterious handler. These kinds of episodes are typically associated with Parkinson’s Disease.

• The infirmity. Hillary needs to be helped up stairs, propped up with pillows everywhere she goes and frequently falls down as she did when she got a concussion. Many doctors have claimed that Hillary has a serious neurological condition or brain damage, as Dr. Drew asserts here.

These kinds of symptoms are typically associated with Parkinson’s Disease.

• The constant presence (until recently when he seems to be hidden) of a large, bald black man with a Diazepam injection pen (to control seizures) and the ability to jump to her aid to reassure her when she has a ‘brain freeze’ or needs a lozenge, water or to buy time during very public speaking coughing tantrums.

Why hasn’t the press informed the public about exactly who this mysterious person really is? Because they have a vested interest in helping keep Hillary’s secret, that’s why. If Donald Trump was being so closely monitored by a medical ghost, the press would’ve hounded him out of the primaries.

Recently, this unknown medical savior has been loosely identified. He appears to be a neurologist until recently working at the “prestigious” Neuroscience Center of Northern New Jersey. Calls to verify he works there now went unanswered.

All in all, to me a very compelling case that Hillary Clinton has something.

And if that something turns out to be anything more serious than allergies and a concussion, well then, she would be instantly unfit and unqualified to become President of the United States.

Update: Just as I was readying this piece for publication, news broke that Hillary Clinton was rushed away from the 9/11 Memorial service in lower Manhattan due to a “medical condition.” As a Conservative I do not support her candidacy for President. However, I hope and pray for her full recovery.

Published in: on September 15, 2016 at 10:11 am  Comments (2)  

The suppressed book

Eye For An Eye — The Story of Jews Who Sought Revenge For the HolocaustMost of the below text is from Amazon Books:

Not for sixty years has a book been so brutally suppressed as An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945. One major newspaper, one major magazine, and three major publishers paid $40,000 for it but were scared off. One printed 6,000 books, then pulped them.

Two dozen publishers read An Eye for an Eye and praised it. “Shocking, “Startling,” “Astonishing,” “Mesmerizing,” “Extraordinary,” they wrote to Author John Sack. “I was rivited,” “I was bowled over,” “I love it,” they wrote, but all two dozen rejected it.

Finally, BasicBooks published An Eye for an Eye. It “sparked a furious controversy,” said Newsweek. It became a best-seller in Europe but was so shunned in America that it also became, in the words of New York Magazine, “The Book They Dare Not Review.”

Since then, both 60 Minutes and The New York Times have corroborated what Sack wrote: that at the end of World War II, thousands of Jews sought revenge for the Holocaust. They set up 1,255 concentration camps for German civilians—German men, women, children and babies. There they beat, whipped, tortured and murdered the Germans.

But presently, in this world of white cowards Sack’s book is out of print…

On Hillary Clinton

At Facebook Todd Ojala asked me: “Do you think that
defeating Hillary Clinton is important?” I replied:

 
Well yes. I am extremely concerned that this witch will start messing with the Second Amendment (and probably the First too).

After the dollar crashes in this decade white Americans will change from “Happy mode” to “Angry mode”. Unfortunately, Angry Mode is not enough for revolutionary action. We will need “Combat Mode”. American whites need time to digest the white nationalist literature that will become fashionable after the crash.

Hillary ClintonBut if Hillary introduces hate speech laws and starts confiscating weapons after blacks chimp out while whites defend their property, I’m not sure there will be enough time for the gradual unfoldment of a pro-white revolutionary mindset. It will just be utter chaos.

A Trump presidency on the other hand, with those two Amendments unmolested, would give whites a pause to rethink things over for some years, perhaps enough for a White Awakening in a world where the dollar will lose its international status.

Dishonest guys

The blog Anthrocivitas: The Gate of All Nations reposted my post “Portugal and the One-Drop Rule” adding images that didn’t appear in my original entry. A commenter of that forum said:

What is wrong with a Portguese [sic] having black blood or mixing with a black person? I am not saying that the Portuguese aren’t white, but what is wrong with Portugal being swarthy?

I registered yesterday to respond but even today I have not been allowed to respond. Surely the admin has not given me commenting privileges. But a female commenter that blogs under the penname of Honest Guy responded to the above comment:

There is nothing wrong with it my opinion. The authors and commentators of the above blog, including a Brazilian, a Mexican and a suspicious looking South African seem to think that there is something wrong with it. In fact, their thesis is that if you have black blood and mix with black persons you will end up like Portugal, with the assumption that Portugal and being Portuguese is inherently negative or undesirable.

Firstly, although I was born in Mexico, I feel being called “Mexican” almost an insult. Physically and psychically I don’t resemble the average Mexican at all. But to respond directly to the above, these guys didn’t even read the article properly (that’s why I’m calling them “dishonest”). Both John Martínez and I made very clear in that post that, to steal a phrase from William Pierce, “a 5% decline in average IQ would cause our civilization to collapse.”

This is exactly what happened in Portugal after reaching the height of European power some centuries ago, before they committed the sin against the holy ghost. And this is what’s happening throughout the West: many whites are repeating Portugal’s blundering on a colossal scale.

Published in: on February 13, 2013 at 2:12 pm  Comments (2)  

Australia is gone

by Pat Hannagan

The following is a recent comment at Kevin MacDonald’s The Occidental Observer:


Australia is rapidly being shutdown in terms of any “free speech” that is not in full concordance with the ruling media and political dynasty of communist anti-Western / anti-White policy and propaganda.

We have the media inquiry instigated by Labor PM Ms Gillard, driven by the appointed Jew Mr Ray Finkelstein QC. (link)

We have NSW “conservative” Premier Mr O’Farrell “…who is concerned there have been no successful criminal prosecutions in the history of the NSW laws and that they have fallen out of step with community expectations”, now demanding an “inquiry that will consider strengthening anti-discrimination laws to make it easier to convict people for serious racial vilification”.

Note well: The inquiry has been welcomed by the president of the Anti-Discrimination Board, Stepan Kerkyasharian, as “a great opportunity to deal with this matter”. Mr Kerkyasharian is, of course, a Jew. (link)

As is the Chairman of the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, Mr John Searle.

It is illegal in Australia to point out what I have above, that certain drivers of anti-discrimination legislation and proponents of racial vilification laws in Australia are Jews.

The prominent neoconservative opinion writer Andrew Bolt, himself a lover of Israel and all things Jewish, was himself set upon by a coterie of Jews and taken to court for “hate speech” towards Aboriginals.

You can read about that also in Quadrant, and note all the Jews who orchestrated the campaign against him, as well as the aforementioned Justice Finkelstein. But, Bolt will never note that the Jews, on the whole, despise and revile him—he loves them! (link)

Furthermore, it is illegal to do so in Australia. That is why it is important that blogs such as Occidental Observer, administered out of the U.S.A. continue to allow comments.

You cannot rely on Australia to lead anything. Our bi-party system is in lock-step to shutdown White Australia, and criminalise White Australians.

Published in: on January 24, 2013 at 6:40 pm  Comments (5)  
Tags: ,

The dishonest Seiyo

In a recent article at the Western Rifle Shooters Association, half-Jew “Takuan Seiyo” said:


I found this discussion late and so can contribute late. There is much to be said against the Jews—as a group—and there is much to say in favor (think contributions since late 18th century, not to speak of the Bible and Christianity itself). It’s good, even important, to write about that, not the least for the benefit of American Jews who don’t seem to have a clue how much their socialist-multiculti-bleeding heart drift alienates them from the American white majority and puts them in a camp of people who are no friends of theirs.

With this said, CA’s [Concerned American] policy is right simply because there seem to be no people around who have the knowledge and the psychological balance to do this analysis correctly and truthfully, so commenters usually prattle nonsense that’s either malignantly false or stupid; antisemitism is after all 2300 years old. If they have the intellectual equipment, such as the premier antisemite of our age, Kevin MacDonald does, they cherry pick among the zillion facts they adduce to flesh out the negative, but suppress the positive in order to build a twisted theory. Or they lack the intellectual equipment altogether and just prattle what they soaked from some snake-swalling preacher about the Jews not being the Jews but WASPs being the Jews; with all of their Bible reading they haven’t even stopped to think that Jesus. Mary, Peter, Paul, the apostles and all Christians for the first 50 years of the creed were Jews, not Yorkshiremen.

I have studied theses issues for a long time and touch on them in my writings. Two of my articles archived at Gates of Vienna are specifically about the JQ; “Critique of the Culture of Kevin McDonald” and “F Street.” [Chechar’s note: Seiyo omits the fact that he “criticized” MacDonald without actually reading his triolgy on Jewry. See my comment at the bottom of this post.] GoV had so much trouble with nazizoid commenters to those two and in other posts where Jews were mentioned that it had to close down discussion of such matters.

Rollory said…

If someone can summarize in a sentence or three what exactly the point and message is of any one of Takuan Seiyo’s articles, I’d be grateful. It was when I realized I couldn’t do that, and that whatever the message might be was lost in the flood of words, that I stopped reading him. It was when he deliberately asserted in a comment thread discussion that I’d said the exact opposite of what I had actually said, in order to brand me with his nazizoidist label, that I stopped considering him to be on the side of the angels. It was when he deliberately and repeatedly refused to engage in the sort of deliberate discussion of facts CA has advocated in the past, preferring instead to assert blanket guilt and self-destructiveness on the part of a people he evidently considers not his own, that I stopped much caring what he has to say about anything. He is a deeply dishonest man.

There certainly are those who assert things about the Jews without providing sufficient evidence. There are also those who draw conclusions from facts in evidence that I don’t find sufficiently justified. This does not make reasonable and sane discussions of the matter impossible. In the GoV discussions he references, it would have been entirely possible to say “I don’t want to discuss that here, and I’m not going to” or “I don’t consider those facts to be a major factor, for such and such reasons.” This is not what was done. Instead he went from zero to nuclear and full insult. “Oh, but he’s so tired of the constant unreasonable attacks!” Stop making excuses for him. I’m part French, I’ve been hearing my nation—a nation with far more qualities than America and Americans have ever displayed, and which has earned my loyalty in ways the USA hasn’t even tried—insulted and demeaned pretty much my entire life, and currently I get to watch the French population being systematically replaced by Muslim Arabs while “genocide” is something only Jews are allowed to own, and I generally manage to keep my mouth shut about it, or to discuss the matter peaceably when the occasion arises. There is no right to be free from insult, even for Jews.

“The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.” It takes a conscious act of will to not notice the applicability of this phrase to repeated actions by Jewish people, including Seiyo himself as I mentioned earlier. Just a couple weeks ago, a Quebec radio host, talking with a Muslim caller, mentioned that he wouldn’t be able to say the same things the caller was because speaking too loudly on certain topics gets one in trouble with the Jews. The local Jewish organization promptly called for him to be sacked. What exactly are they trying to prove? Rick Sanchez claimed Jews have a lot of power at CNN; they promptly demonstrated their… lack of power?—by getting him fired. A Jewish journalist went looking for non-Jews in positions of power in Hollywood; he found six, one of which turned out to be Jewish after all. I could go on all day, but that’s not the point—the point is that there is measurable evidence and facts concerning hypocrisy and power and Jewish reactions to taking note of these facts, and that the only response ever made to this by the pro-Jewish side of any argument is precisely the dishonest and hypocritical one that CA made: ridicule, and a refusal to actually address any facts, either by refusing to bring them up or refusing to engage in discussion on the topic by ruling it out of bounds.

Concerned American [CA] said…

Citations, sir?

Also, did you actually read the linked Seiyo articles?

Thank you for voicing your predispositions as well.

Rollory said…

The world we are living in today is the direct and linear result of the victory in 1945. It is a world created by the victors of 1945. It is designed and run according to their principles, and implements many of the goals they explicitly advocated. Everything that is happening today, from the Muslim rape gangs in European suburbs to English nationalists getting locked up in an Orwellian manner to the TSA accustoming “born free” citizens to having their daughters’ breasts groped to Congress fuming impotently at its bureaucracy and not firing it to the massive taxation increases on the most productive to the dissolving of sovereignty in international bureaucracies to the American presidency becoming a thing to be bought and used in a manner directly contrary to the expressed wishes of the people and in fact the general trend of governments everywhere in the white nations deliberately persisting in courses of actions their people repeatedly object to but don’t seem to have the ability to stop—every bit of this is the legacy of the victors of 1945. It is their doing, their responsibility, their worldview brought to life.

In 1945, the bad guys won

Every single man who has fought and bled in the service of the victors of 1945 and their inheritors has fought and bled in the service of evil.

Maybe the other side were bad guys also. Maybe they weren’t. I’m not saying they didn’t kill a lot of people—I do say genocide is justified at times, depending on perspective, in the same way that killing a man is justified at times—depending on perspective. Nobody wants to die, but irreconcilable differences exist. I also know this much: the victor writes the history books, the victor always makes the other side out to be worse than they actually were while hiding its own misdeeds, and in this case, the victors have been proven by their own actions to be civilization- and nation-destroying oathbreaking scumbags. I also know that the people running things right now lie like they breathe; from carbohydrates to cholesterol to equality to finance to genetics to who voted when and where to what actually happened in any given foreign policy crisis to what gets reported and what gets suppressed in the newspapers and talking-head shows each day.

Nothing I am told by this system and this society is to be trusted. If they say the sky is blue, I will walk outside to check for myself.

Everything is on the table.

That includes Hitler.

He may have been wrong about some things. He may have been wrong about a lot of things. Based on the reading I’ve done so far, there certainly were things he didn’t get right. There were certainly also things that he did.

Have YOU read Mein Kampf, or Table Talks? (I haven’t, yet.) Do you really trust what you’re told about it, when the same people give you Tina Fey saying “I can see Russia from my house!”, and Obama insisting he did so call it a terrorist attack?

Do you really have to have it explained to you, again, that you’re being lied to?

“Oh, but they wouldn’t lie about that!”

There’s a funny thing about the “Big Lie”. People talk about it in the context of the Nazis, as a Nazi propaganda tactic. In fact, it was a Nazi accusation. The Nazis were saying that their enemies were telling gigantic monstrous lies that nobody would even think to disbelieve. They never advocated it as something for their own propaganda to engage in. But that’s not how it is remembered. The “Big Lie” has itself become a Big Lie.

Chuck said…

Rollory said: “I do say genocide is justified at times, depending on perspective, in the same way that killing a man is justified at times—depending on perspective.”

Are you fucking kidding me?

Rollory said…

Finally, a quote.

“The fundamental realization of the Dark Enlightenment is that all men are not created equal, not individual men, nor the various groups and categories of men, nor are women equal to men, that these beliefs and others like them are religious beliefs, that society is just as religious as ever it was, with an official state religion of progressivism, but this is a new religion, an evil religion, and, if you are a Christian, a demonic religion.

The Dark Enlightenment does not propose that leftism went wrong four years ago, or ten years ago, but that it was fundamentally and terribly wrong a couple of centuries ago, and we have been heading to hell in a handbasket ever since at a rapidly increasing rate—that the enlightenment was dangerously optimistic about humans, human nature, and the state, that it is another good news religion, telling us what we wish to hear, but about this world instead of the next.”

We are not Jedi, we are Sith. The Jedi have lost their way, and we understand the truth both of their now-perverted ideals and the reality underlying them better than they ever did.

That is why we will win.



My comment for this blog:

At Gates of Vienna (GOV) Takuan Seiyo told the lie that I am a Holocaust denier; I didn’t even bother to reply but now…

Seiyo writes that that Kevin MacDonald cherry picks “among the zillion facts they adduce to flesh out the negative, but suppress the positive in order to build a twisted theory.”

I see that, almost three years after my article “A lightning in the middle of the night!” Seiyo has not addressed the thrust of my direct challenge to him: that Jews “are never over-represented in organizations or movements that represent the interests of the ethnic majority, only those that weaken that majority.”

The “positive” that Seiyo writes about is in fact neutral in the sense that Jewish contributions to technology, science or commerce are not meant to improve whites qua whites as a race: for example a medical discovery applies to all Gentiles, and Jewry too. The real point of my 2010 piece was that Jews never represent the ethnic interests of whites; only the interests that weaken whites as an ethnic group.

But in that thread in the older incarnation of my blog Seiyo never really addressed my challenge and it’s improbable he will address it now. He is a man who wants to have it both ways: he purports to defend the West but if Western interests collide with Jewish interests he automatically sides the latter.

I see that at the thread of the Western Rifle Shooters Association Seiyo mentions the decision of the admin of Gates of Vienna, Ned May (“Baron Bodissey”), to censor all discussion on the Jewish Question as if Ned “had so much trouble with nazizoid commenters.”

That’s another lie.

Ned closed comments after a challenge by some of GOV-ers—to accept criticism of Jews only provided that the critics were Jews or half-Jews. I accepted the challenge in the form of the excerpts I typed with the purpose of showing GOV-ers how even an academic of Jewish origin touches the question, Albert Lindemann in Esau’s Tears. But apparently it was not possible to discuss the JQ at GOV even after I took the trouble to type all those excerpts from Esau’s Tears for GOV-ers to see.

But aside Seiyo’s lies (that Ned “had so much trouble with nazizoid commenters”), I believe that Rollory summarized above the broadest issues better than what I did at the bottom of this post.

For my collection exposing Seiyo, see these entries at WDH (with the exception of “Liberals–about to be mugged by reality” that are quotations of Seiyo’s online book).

Published in: on December 19, 2012 at 8:13 pm  Comments (9)  
Tags: